Moving target: where's the strategy in Michigan's budget?

Lansing insiders, including more than a few cynics, are already predicting a government shutdown this fall due to a brewing budget battle that could make 2007 look like a picnic. The storm clouds spinning into a vortex just offshore include plummeting tax revenues, planned cuts to nearly every interest in the state budget, from human services to higher ed and scholarship funding to furloughs for state workers, and on and on and on.

Despite the one-time gift of federal stimulus money, the House and Senate remain at least $300 million apart on their separate budget approaches.

The state begins its 2009-10 budget in October. The Center for Michigan has tracked the budget proposals for 2009-10 since February. As of early this month, even with the one-time gift of huge federal stimulus dollars, the House and Senate are at least $300 million apart on their approaches for how to spend the general fund — the main discretionary purse for the state.

Click here for an at-a-glance summary of the proposals since February.

Quick takeaways:

1. SLASH AND BURN. The House has set a target to slash 7 percent and the Senate 10 percent from the budget first proposed by Gov. Jennifer Granholm in February.

2. THE COST OF POVERTY. Under any proposed scenario, the combined cost of social programs, prisons, courts, and state police account for at least two-thirds of general fund spending.

3. LAW AND ORDER. As a percentage of overall planned spending, the costs of courts, prisons, and state police have remained whole since the original proposal in February.

4. MIXED SIGNALS ON EDUCATION. At the national economic summit in Detroit this week, the governor talked for the umpteenth time about the importance of improving Michigan’s proportion of college graduates. But the latest legislative budgets would slash $90 million or more from colleges and universities — with some of those cuts coming in college scholarships. But funding for community colleges has so far remained whole at roughly $300 million.

5. WHERE’S THE STRATEGY? As we and many others have pointed out since the 2007 budget debacle, there is no clearly delineated strategy in the state budget. What are we, as a people, trying to accomplish with this budget? So far, the budget negotiations have been a painful and tortured attempt to limit bleeding and preserve many status quo functions if not their traditional funding.

This entry was posted in Accountability, Clear Taxing & Spending, Fresh Thoughts, The Center at Work. Bookmark the permalink. Trackbacks are closed, but you can post a comment.

3 Comments

  1. David Hockenbrocht
    Posted June 19, 2009 at 6:57 am | Permalink

    The State needs a new generation budget unconnected to the current 1950.s budget currently in place

  2. Steve
    Posted June 19, 2009 at 10:17 am | Permalink

    “Where’s the strategy?” Ask Governor Emerson….

  3. ERIC WINKELMAN
    Posted June 19, 2009 at 3:49 pm | Permalink

    It’s about being compettive and survival !

    Until Michigan revises its outdated, non-competitive, business unfriendly taxing policies, we will remain in a depression long after the rest of the nation is on its way to economic recovery !!

    It means everyone and every municipality who receives state funding will have to do a lot more with a lot less !!

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>