By John Bebow - January 17, 2008
Last week we discussed the urgent need for Great Lakes states to move forward on a coordinated water management strategy through passage of the Great Lakes Compact.
Noah Hall, an assistant law professor at Wayne State University, offers a quick yet thorough read of the history and future of Great Lakes legal protections in a law review article:
"For over one hundred years, federal and state governments have struggled with management of the Great Lakes. A vast resource shared by two countries, ten states and provinces, and hundreds of Indian tribes and First Nations, the Great Lakes are a quintessential commons that have seen their share of tragedies. Addressing the potentially competing pressures of
economic development and environmental protection is only part of the challenge. The real struggle has been in governance. How is management of an international transboundary resource best accomplished under the legal and political limitations of constitutional federalism? This question is not unique to the Great Lakes. With the federal government stepping back (or being pushed back) from environmental protection, states need to explore new options for managing resources and environmental problems that cross political boundaries."
If you are lucky enough this winter to be among the fortunate snowbirds who can spend a little time on a beach in a southern climate, consider taking along a copy of Hall's article. The beach "down there" will likely pale in comparison to the beauty of the Great Lakes, but the reading will help you prepare as a citizen for what will be one of Michigan's most important public policy issues for decades to come.



One Comment
The Great Lakes Compact to regulate all inland water sources as supported by certain State Representatives must be stopped dead in its tracks. Inland waters not only consist of the Great Lakes but also the whole Great Lakes watershed. This includes but is not limited to ponds, streams, rivers and even the aquifers under our properties. The supporters of this policy want to actually meter private water wells and charge people for using what is rightfully theirs. People are losing their rights and more and more of their money everyday and we can’t sit back and let this go on any longer. Just because the water on or under our properties eventually flows back into the Great Lakes does not make it theirs while it’s actually under our property. The majority of supporters do not even live in the great lakes watershed. The powers to be are trying to slip this through with “clarifying language” but this is a smokescreen. It is basically another energy grab! We do not need the compact as we already have a federal law protecting diversion of the Great Lakes. If our water is in a state trust our God given right to water will be in the hands of a few and they can revoke our right to our own water at anytime. The air we breathe eventually flows away from our house. Do they want to regulate the air and eventually and charge us for it? When are people going to wake up and put a stop to all this nonsense?
Post a Comment