The Center for Michigan :: A Forum for Our State's Future


Conact Us
Newsletter
About the Center
Michigan's Defining Moment
Donate
The Center at Work

Reform: 6 Questions for Michigan's Future


By John Bebow - June 20, 2008

By Phil Power and John Bebow

Michigan is at a hinge in our history. The decisions we will over the next few years will go a long way to determine the kind of state we’ll have in the next half century.

This year and in the watershed election of 2010, Michigan voters will overhaul our political leadership. Michiganders say over and over they're hoping for much more bipartisan collaboration in Lansing. So these elections offer a real opportunity for candidates to face the big issues confronting us all, find common ground, and not get diverted into merely scoring partisan political points.

The Michigan's Defining Moment campaign has so far brought together nearly 2,000 Michigan citizens in 180 small community conversations to develop a shared vision for Michigan's best future and to work out strategies and tactics to achieve that vision. It can be both good policy and smart politics for candidates to take advantage of the MDM campaign and its 6,000 hours of thoughtful citizen deliberation about Michigan's future.

To get a handle on how candidates react to this agenda, consider using the questions below:

1) What is your vision of what Michigan should be and what strategies and tactics do you propose to get there?

2)What far-reaching strategies ideas have you developed to reform and improve our state? How will you partner with your fellow legislators and business and community leaders to achieve real urgency and focused political will to address our greatest challenges?

3) Recent polls show voters want bipartisan cooperation among lawmakers. How, exactly, will you work toward that?

4) Through in-depth community dialogue, MDM participants established three main priorities: 1) Assuring a talented, globally competitive workforce; 2) Diversifying the state economy and enhancing Michigan’s quality of life; and 3) Greatly improving the efficiency, effectiveness and accountability of government. What will you do as a legislator to advance these priorities?

5) Legislators’ most fundamental task is setting the state budget – a task that has proven extremely difficult in recent years. What, specifically, is your state budget strategy?

6) MDM participants developed more than two dozen action steps to a better state. Here's a representative sample. Please provide some insight on how you will address these needs:

__ Dramatically improved school and college completion rates

__ Reigning in excessive state prison spending

__ Balance the protection of Michigan’s distinctive natural resources with sustainable economic development.

__ Ending or lengthening term limits for legislators to combat inexperience in Lansing.

__ Growing an entrepreneurial, job-growing culture and instituting a fair and simple state business tax.

__ Manage large and growing public sector employee pension and health care costs.

The sooner candidates for state offices get beyond partisan dogma and thoughtfully address questions like these, the sooner Michigan can get past our current crisis and on the road to recovery.

When candidates knock on your door or shake your hand at the county fair, consider posing these questions. If you are met with blank stares, consider whether that candidate deserves your vote. If you receive thoughtful, solid answers, you just might be onto somebody you can support.


Related Posts
Crain's Detroit Business - "Ann Arbor Think Tank Wants Nonpartisan Vision for State"
Kalamazoo Gazette - "Tax Reform Tops Legislative Agenda"
Center launches major TV debate project
Recruiting New Political Talent
Reform: Candidates Embrace MDM

4 Comments

  1. Rich
    Posted June 20, 2008 at 1:28 pm | Permalink

    Not sure I agree that ending or lengthening term limits is a good thing. If the politicians don't know how to do basic tasks like teamwork, understand budgets, communicate, prioritize, and accomplish programs, then we as voters have elected the WRONG person for the job. Limited terms means that we can get rid of that person sooner rather than later. Let's face it, most running for political office are not the sharpest tacks in the box.

  2. Jeffrey Poling
    Posted June 21, 2008 at 9:37 am | Permalink

    I have to agree with Rich. Politicians will say anything that they think you want to hear just to get elected. Once in office they pursue their own agenda. Term limits at least allows us to get the deadbeats out before they do too much damage. As to addressing the argument that the time required to learn the job is limited by term limits, the fact is that the structure of government is just to complex for anyone, other than a genius, to comprehend (and I don't see any geniuses in public office). The complexity has been introduced on purpose to keep the average citizen from getting involved. Would it not be better if we worked to simplyfy government thereby allowing those elected to learn their jobs quickly and also promote more interest from the general public?

  3. Posted June 21, 2008 at 6:53 pm | Permalink

    KC Mueller
    I think we have made a big mistake with term limits. We actually have fewer choices now. The candidates who are elected seem to decide among themselves who is going to run for the next position when their term is up. They agree ahead of time to switch places at times. We always had the right to vote those out of office who did not measure up. Now we lose the good ones who have to go onto some other office and the learning curve starts all over. On a related note, we would be better off if riders on bills were eliminated. Too many bad laws came into effect due to bad riders. KC Mueller

  4. thenose
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 3:55 pm | Permalink

    Serious tort and litigation reform is a must if Michigan is to control the cost of housing criminals. It is not that we necessarily incarcerate too many people, but the cost of their incarceration is directly related to the level of medical care the inmates receive and frivelous lawsuits we are forced to defend. If we could change the inmates right to sue, we could have much improved roadways and public parks, labor free.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *
*
*