|
|
October 30, 2008 – 12:40 pm
October 24, 2008 – 11:21 am
If you get a knock on your door in the next 10 days from someone running for the Michigan House of Representatives, a short list of detailed questions can help you determine if they have a grip on the challenges facing Michigan, Phil Power writes this week.
See how dozens of candidates respond to challenging, future-oriented questions by watching our online candidate forums.
And, seats are still available for our remaining candidate forums next week.
October 24, 2008 – 11:16 am
At long last, we're coming into the home stretch of a long, loooong election campaign.
Yes, many of us are ready for it to be over, and yes, there are all sorts of important races on the ballot. But take a minute to think about some vital ones that aren't getting that much attention.
In many ways, the ones that should matter most to us in Michigan are the contests for 110 seats in the House of Representatives. Every seat is up for grabs, and more than half involve incumbent lawmakers. There are 45 open seats, however, most ones where incumbents have been term-limited out of office.
The winners will have a heavy load on their plates. Michigan's economy has been in the dumps for years, and the recent Wall Street meltdown and the coming national recession can't help matters.
These are uncertain times for all of us. But this much IS certain:
Michigan is at an important hinge in our history. The decisions we will make over the next few years will go a long way to determine the kind of state we'll have in the next half century, or longer. Starting with this year's vote and continuing through the watershed election of 2010, Michigan voters will overhaul our political leadership almost completely. Michiganders say over and over again they’re disappointed there’s so much political sniping between the parties. They want much more bipartisan collaboration in Lansing.
The media tend to cover elections by concentrating on the big politically contentious questions such as abortion, tax policy, stem cell research and medical marijuana.
What they seldom look at is how the candidates propose to work together -- something essential if we are ever to make any progress. Very little attention is paid to areas where candidates can find common ground, instead of merely scoring partisan points.
You may find candidates or their advocates knocking on your front door over the next couple of weeks. Here’s an idea -- instead of just shutting the door or taking their literature, consider asking them these questions. They might serve as a quick guide to help you make up your mind for whom and how to vote:
1) What is your vision of what Michigan should be? What strategies and tactics do you propose to get us there? How exactly do you fit your vision for our state into your budget priorities?
For example, if you think Michigan should be spending more on our colleges and universities, what specific areas would you cut to free up the money for higher education?
2) What far-reaching strategies do you have to reform and improve our state? If you want to restore the Great Lakes to health, how will you partner with your fellow legislators and business and community leaders to get there? How will you see that your goal is treated with the urgency it deserves? How will you focus political will to advance your strategy?
3) Why do you think it has been so difficult for Michigan to adopt far-reaching strategies to reform and improve our state? Can you point to an occasion when you have bucked your party's orthodoxy or stood up to the leaders of your caucus?
Neither party has a monopoly on good ideas. Nor is one party alone responsible for all the problems. But if you listen to the talk coming out of Lansing, it too often sounds that way. So ask your would-be lawmaker: When confronted by a really good idea from the other side, will you have the guts to push partisanship aside and collaborate?
4) Recent polls show voters are looking for bipartisan cooperation. So ask your candidate: How, exactly, will you work toward that? Under what circumstances will you collaborate with your opposition colleagues? Are you willing to take heat and threats from the important special interests that fund your party, whether we’re talking about organized labor or Right To Life?
Beyond a doubt, the sooner those running for state offices get beyond partisan dogma and thoughtfully address questions like these, the sooner Michigan can get on the road to recovery.
So, when candidates knock on your door or shake your hand consider posing these questions. If you get blank stares, consider whether that candidate deserves your vote. If you receive thoughtful, solid answers, you just might be onto somebody you can support.
***
Editor’s Note: Former newspaper publisher and University of Michigan Regent Phil Power is a longtime observer of Michigan politics and economics, and a former chairman of the Michigan chapter of the Nature Conservancy. He is also the founder and president of The Center for Michigan, a centrist think-and-do tank which publishes the Michigan Scorecard. The opinions expressed here are Power’s own and do not represent the official views of The Center. He welcomes your comments at ppower@thecenterformichigan.net.
October 24, 2008 – 11:13 am
Congrats to six Metro Detroit communities for earning the title of the region's most entrepreneurial cities..
Auburn Hills, Dundee, Plymouth Township, Southfield, Tecumseh and Troy.
That news comes from the University of Michigan-Dearborn's Center for Innovation Research...
The 2008 “eCities” study (or “the Entrepreneurial Cities Index”) found that many southeast Michigan municipalities “are hard at work attracting, cultivating, building and holding entrepreneurial firms.”
The study, conducted by iLabs, the Center for Innovation Research in the UM–Dearborn School of Management, focuses on entrepreneurship because of its importance to expansion and diversification of Michigan’s regional economies and the impact small businesses have on job creation.
This second annual UM-Dearborn study found that successful communities work with entrepreneurial businesses to determine their needs and carry out relationship marketing akin to private sector firms.
“Economic development agencies, local chambers of commerce, and state agencies all are instrumental in helping bring firms to a community,” said Timothy Davis, director of iLabs. “Successful local governments also have professional and empowered staffs who champion new businesses, leading them to solutions and acting as a conduit for networking.”
For this year’s report, the UM-Dearborn researchers developed an online interface to allow communities to enter public data and 36 communities in southeastern Michigan took part in the study, up from 14 in 2007.
The UM-Dearborn study used the data supplied by the communities as well as other public records to assemble a six-factor, 31-item index to measure entrepreneurial activity, looking at such factors as “clustering,” incentives, growth, policies, community and education.
October 24, 2008 – 10:46 am
Neither side can win. Neither Democrats nor Republicans can advance Michigan without working with the other side. I keep saying that to anyone who will listen. The state prison system is the clearest example I can cite.
The state is on the edge of another budget train wreck. A loosely affiliated coalition of reform-minded groups is fixed on the state Corrections Department as the best possible way to save money.
Look for possible movement as early as the end of the month as the Council of State Governments is working on bipartisan recommendations to deal with Michigan's sentencing and prison operations policies that continue to overshadow many other competing interests (education, local government, tax reform, etc.) for shrinking state tax dollars.
Here's a summary of the positions of four key stakeholders who will need to find common ground to make reform a reality:
CITIZENS RESEARCH COUNCIL -- TOUGH-ON-CRIME PHILOSOPHY IS INEFFECTIVE AND TOO EXPENSIVE: This group of independent budget researchers is alarmed that Michigan's prison population has grown 538 percent and corrections spending has grown more than 5,000 percent in the last 34 years. One-third of all state employees work in in the prison system -- a workforce that has grown seven times larger in the past three decades. Michigan incarcerates more people and keeps them in prison longer than the rest of the Great Lakes region. Michigan spends 61 percent more per capita on prisons than neighboring states. Salaries in the Michigan prison system are 20 percent higher than those in neighboring states.
BUSINESS GROUPS WANT REFORMS IN SENTENCING AND OPERATIONS: Detroit Renaissance has called for reducing the state prison population and privatizing things like food service to save more than $400 million a year. The Detroit Regional Chamber also calls for sentencing reforms and various forms of privatization to save hundreds of millions of dollars per year.
GRANHOLM ADMINISTRATION -- SENTENCING REFORM IS BEST OPTION: Corrections officials quibble with some of the Citizen Research Council's numbers on where Michigan ranks on some prison spending. But the department has not yet issued detailed calculations that would rebut CRC's findings. And, Corrections department leadership and the governor agree with CRC that lighter sentencing and other methods to reduce recidivism could save hundreds of millions of dollars without threatening public safety. The Corrections Department is resistant to ideas to cut employee pay or close more prisons and take away jobs in communities where prisons are located. Officials have not been particularly quick to jump on the business bandwagon for privatization and point to many reforms already made that have, as of this week, brought the prison population down to 49,600 inmates -- the lowest level in several years.
SENATE REPUBLICANS -- OPERATIONS REFORM IS BEST OPTION: No sentencing reform is possible without the agreement of the Republican-controlled Senate. Senators Alan Cropsey and Wayne Kuipers lead the Senate's policy positions on corrections. In May, they issued a report dismissing sentencing reform out of hand as a threat to public safety. The senators also point out their own litany of troubling findings. Prison guard overtime has more than doubled in the past five years. Prisoner health care costs are up more than 40 percent over the same time period -- in part because of federal court orders that provide for better care of prisoners than many law-abiding citizens can obtain. Taxpayers spend $250 million a year on prisoner health care. Mental health services cost $1,660 per prisoner per year in Michigan compared to $662 in Minnesota or $415 in Texas. Telemedicine, teleconferencing, reduced spending on transportation, and privatization of various prison operations are the senators' reform approaches.
October 24, 2008 – 9:36 am
Doug Drake tried to warn us.
"Are you ready for some grumbling?" Drake asked a crowd two years ago at a statewide tax policy conference hosted by the Center for Michigan. A veteran of many state budget and tax fights, Drake raised concerns about the prospects of replacing Michigan's old SBT business tax.
Let me remind you of the crazy legacy of business tax "reform" dating back to the beginning of 2006...
Acting on pressure from business groups who said the SBT was an unfair, unreasonable, and overly complicated choke on growth, the Michigan Legislature voted in March 2006 to repeal the SBT, the state's main business tax, without offering any kind of replacement. "We are taking action because we cannot wait another minute," then-Speaker of the House Craig DeRoche declared. Nearly two years of unproductive, partisan in-fighting ensued, resulting in a near-government shutdown and a much-maligned new business tax, the MBT, with a 22 percent surcharge that instantly turned purple the faces of accountants everywhere.
Now comes a poll from Crain's saying businesses preferred the old SBT to the new MBT.
"Most businesses had conformed their practices to the SBT, understood the SBT, and while there were aspects of it they didn't like, it was a known quantity," said June Summers Haas, a partner at Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn and a recognized state tax expert.
At this point, it's hard to understand how anybody who's been involved in tax reform -- the governor, legislators, chambers of commerce, lobbyists, convening groups like the Center -- can feel anything but shame and embarrassment at this debacle.
Shouldn't the business groups who pushed for SBT repeal be just as concerned about a credibility problem as the elected folks in the Capitol? Aren't we all better than this? Michigan certainly deserves better.
October 24, 2008 – 9:23 am
October 24, 2008 – 8:31 am
Talk about mass transit trains and high-speed rail has picked up steam in Michigan's two biggest cities in the past couple years. In August, public support for mass transit was evident as voters approved 15 out of 16 transit millage votes, mostly for busses.
Chris McCarus, Michigan's roving and always forward-looking radio correspondent, reports that the next test of public support for transit in the face of economic crisis is a CATA millage in Lansing in November.
Click here to listen to McCarus' CATA story, or catch his other recent recent reports in the MichiganNow archive.
October 24, 2008 – 8:13 am
Here's another hopeful example of regional cooperation...
"I wanted to note that Gratiot County, Michigan has over 20 local units of government working together on a joint countywide master plan," writes Chelsey Foster, in response to our post last week about the Grand Traverse region's long-range community planning process. "This is the first master plan of its kind in Michigan, with the county, cities, villages, and townships all sitting at the same table to develop one master plan that will address the individual aspirations and concerns of each unit, but in the overall context of the County. The group recently was awarded the Partnerships for Change: Sustainable Communities Large-Scale Grant from Traverse City-based Land Information Access Association."
Gratiot County sits right in the middle of the state, on the road between Lansing and Mt. Pleasant. Click for more about what they call the "GREAT" plan...
"Gratiot County leaders realize that the future of the community is in their hands and that multi-jurisdictional cooperation is essential. For instance, traffic doesn't stop at political boundaries and shoppers and commuters cross township, city and village lines without blinking. Air, water and wildlife also flow continuously past these dividing lines. From farmlands to downtown districts, shared cultural and natural resources need to be addressed from the perspective of the larger community. For this reason, the townships, cities, and villages of Gratiot County have teamed with each other and with Partnerships for Change - Sustainable Communities to develop the Gratiot Regional Excellence and Transformation (GREAT) Plan, a county-wide master plan that is written and adopted by all of the participating local jurisdictions. This level of inter-jurisdictional cooperation is groundbreaking in Michigan - we believe this document will be the first of its kind!
"Partnerships for Change - Sustainable Communities is a program that provides grants of professional planning support and technical assistance to townships, cities and villages for cooperative efforts that contribute to the preservation of cultural and natural resources. The Partnerships for Change - Sustainable Communities program is managed by LIAA and sponsored by the Michigan Townships Association, Michigan Municipal League, Michigan Association of Planning, and Michigan State University Extension."
October 17, 2008 – 9:52 am
The role of young professionals in Michigan's future economy, mass transit, and the entrepreneurial economy are expected topics next Monday, October 20, as the Center for Michigan sponsors an inner ring suburb candidates forum at ePrize in Pleasant Ridge. Click here for the full list of our remaining Michigan House of Representatives candidate events in Flint, Battle Creek, Macomb County, and elsewhere.
New state House candidate debates are also posted in our video debate library. The latest include numerous "debate orphans" -- Republicans and Democrats alike whose opponents declined the joint invitation to debate from the Center for Michigan and Detroit Public Television.
All of this ongoing candidate outreach is part of the Michigan's Defining Moment Public Engagement Campaign efforts to amplify citizen voices and take a common ground citizens agenda straight to those we all elect to serve in Lansing. The candidate outreach continues to earn statewide media coverage...
IN FARMINGTON: Candidates square off during spirited debate
IN JACKSON: Revenue Sharing Suppported
IN GREENVILLE: 70th District Hopefuls Take Jabs
|