<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Dirty Trick Nixed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thecenterformichigan.net/blog/a-dirty-trick-nixed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thecenterformichigan.net/blog/a-dirty-trick-nixed/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.thecenterformichigan.net/blog/a-dirty-trick-nixed/#comment-1632</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 03:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecenterformichigan.net/blog/a-dirty-trick-nixed/#comment-1632</guid>
		<description>Partisan politics at its ugliest.  Shameful!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Partisan politics at its ugliest.  Shameful!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara O'Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.thecenterformichigan.net/blog/a-dirty-trick-nixed/#comment-1602</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara O'Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 20:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecenterformichigan.net/blog/a-dirty-trick-nixed/#comment-1602</guid>
		<description>I agree with Collette, Grebner, et al. that the voting records should not be the sole property of political parties. 

On the other hand, I agree with Doster that political primaries are--and should be--private, party events, open to those willing to declare themselves as having party affiliation, with no cross-over allowed. I think this is necessary in order for elected officials to have some accountability to the party on an on-going basis, not just directly to the electorate once every several years.

Then should primaries be publicly funded? I certainly wouldn't want to charge people to vote in a primary and thereby shut out low-income voters. And some primaries are non-partisan. Suggestions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Collette, Grebner, et al. that the voting records should not be the sole property of political parties. </p>
<p>On the other hand, I agree with Doster that political primaries are--and should be--private, party events, open to those willing to declare themselves as having party affiliation, with no cross-over allowed. I think this is necessary in order for elected officials to have some accountability to the party on an on-going basis, not just directly to the electorate once every several years.</p>
<p>Then should primaries be publicly funded? I certainly wouldn't want to charge people to vote in a primary and thereby shut out low-income voters. And some primaries are non-partisan. Suggestions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
